I saw people wrote in to complain about this shop, Laundry Unlimited. I request my son to write in here because I am an Auntie who has faced very bad service from them too. The incident that person have with the shop owner, Linda and husband is very similar to the one we faced. My son had to go down and tell them why the charges on our invoices are not correct and they demand it is correct and our clothing must constantly be dry cleaned, cannot wash. We made a report to the police in Marine Parade and they have given Laundry Unlimited a stern warning to the shop. The police adviced my son who speaks English to go into this website and launch our complain so that all the people in Singapore and globally would know about it and not give them any business. I hope none of you suffer from their bad treatment and dishonest business. For those who are using them already, get out before you end up like many of us. Eventually, would be your turn. There is a very good one we found down the road, called Duo Nini Pte Ltd laundry service. The boss, Victor Ong is very professional and gentleman. Good luck!

This shop has done laundry services without acting on the customer's instruction. There have been several occasions where the clothing were dry cleaned without informing us when I have asked for laundry or washing services, stated clearly on the quote invoices. Then, when the items were delivered, they demanded payment based on dry cleaning charges which of course is much higher. On the last incident, they threatened to keep all the clothing if I do not pay up. So, my family and I drove to their shop in 480 Changi Road Singapore 419894 Tel: (65) 6442 7576 Fax: (65) 6442 1187 and confronted the owner on a proper explanation, Linda, @ 96814043. She refused to give any explanation and told us to leave her shop. We contacted the police immediately and she and her husband were told by the police to settle what the customer, myself has asked for because in the first place, they failed to carry out their service honestly. Do not go to this shop. They cheat, they speak nasty words opposed to their customers and they gang up as a family and tell customers off. I heard from many others that their service sucks!

On the subject of the gentleman from Glendale, who had poor service from Mr. Lopez, I just reckon the whole recent thought of greatest tires on the back is a real hoot. So, this is not "hearsay", as Eucommia so eloquently suggests. Also, it's not about buying four tires if the person can only afford two at a time. How about considering the individual here, for once, and not trying to speak for them. The economy is poor-and has been-for many of us. Such a line as Eucommia's "buy 4 tires and there won't be any issues" is of no consideration, therefore, and neither, then, is his opinion. I worked in tire & auto services for years. That was in the "ancient" times when we really thought that the greatest tires should go on the front, since the front takes all the wear and tear, curves, and the average everyday front-wheel drive being the center of control. How crazy we really must have been, huh? Another gentleman here mentions hydroplaning and how placing the greatest tires on the back controls this-and traction. Right, but, by doing such happens not to control the hydroplane and traction of the front, which is where your power, again, is located. If I'm sliding on ice or snow, do I want the superior tires on the front or back? Question yourself such a question. A small fish-tailing in the back is hardly going to cause an accident. By placing the greatest on the back, we're putting the sled before the DOGs … literally. If you look up the statistics, such reported accidents have risen nationally SINCE this "regulatory" measure. Another thing about this is how the companies are relating the whole thing to government regulating. This is not right. The government only suggests such, this isn't a law. The reason why so many tire dealers are copping out on it is because, well … it sells more tires. The front tires constantly receive the most wear, so if you find new reasons not to replace them, the wear will only increase, of course. But, so does the danger of driving on them. But, even when we were placing the greatest on the front, the customer had the right to decline. This tactic is just another one of those being used to push the consumer into purchasing. The only problem is that this is exactly what doesn't work, when it comes to winning over customers. I recently stopped in our local Omaha Costco. I've only had excellent service from this store. In fact, I've had superior service in this location than any other Costco in any city I've frequented and the staff is very courteous. So, here's the tale: I have a used Chevy Impala and knew it was going to need tires when I recently bought it. I hadn't noticed the really poor shape of the rear ones, though, which were really worse than the front. My terrible. So, when I questioned if I could have a rotation, since I'd noticed the fronts weren't in the greatest of shape, they declined, due the shape of the rears. Just call me Mr. Myopic. They told me that they could only rotate these if I replaced the rear, as they should have said. So, this is completely justified. Again, my terrible. The car is front-wheel drive, of course, and I wanted excellent tires on the front. Due to budgeting, I was going to have to wait a bit to replace the the other set. So, they replaced the rears … and then told me that the greatest tires have to stay on the rear-??? Wait, but you just said … . Confusing? Yes, a bit. So, I was being misinformed. They sold the tires to me, but were less than straight about how they'd be handling this situation, giving me the thought that I was going to rotate after replacement. So, I had to take this, now being stuck (yes, to all you non-believers – stuck!) I had fantastic tires on the back and, still, the less than so on the front. Back to square one. Costco – 1 Me-0 A snow hit right after this, though, and what do you reckon happpened? Well, I had no traction, was hydroplaning, couldn't get through at all, cars passing me, my car sliding all over. After twice getting caught in the snow on a side street, I was capable to pull out but had to back up about a block, which was okay, since there was no traffic. The back tires handled this reverse fantastically well! Too terrible I just can't drive in reverse everywhere-and it's not even a rear-wheel drive!!! Costco still says it did the right thing and won't sWITCH them. Blah! Blah! Blah! Oh, the tangled web we weave. I used to get mad with such things. Now, I just get back, which is why I'm writing this, in the first place. Since I am economically challenged at the moment, I'm driving my ancient Honda, which has ancient tires, all still working superior than the Impala's mix of ancient and new. Oh, and I'm not shopping at the Omaha Costco anymore. As much as I'm NOT a Sears fan, by any means, I may need to use 'em a bit more … at least for tires. That is where I'll be buying the second pair, in ca